Thursday, February 4, 2021

Reflecting on FREN 379 Francophone Literature and Cinema spring 2019


5/8/2019 and 2/4/2021 

I had grand aspirations for this upper level course that mixed literature and film. I really wanted to focus on an input/output model like I'd been working on for our ACTFL presentation, but it didn't work out AT ALL as expected. 

Here was the course map:

FREN 379 Francophone Literatures and Cinemas

Start of the course:
1.intro to basic literary terms/techniques (see analyse d'un passage and the 310 text for ideas)
  • at the start give an ungraded quiz to assess where they're at
  • ask them to apply them to texts they've already read
  • give them a quiz
  • mid-semester quiz again
2.Quick review passé simple
3.Provide links to Tex's French Grammar for p.c. vs imp, conditional and subjunctive

Une si longue lettre first since it’s a little easier structurally

For the first text
  • INPUT: historical/cultural context: me provide basic info and ask basic comprehension questions (T/F, multiple choice) based on them. Do as homework and turn in directly in Canvas.
  • preview/predicting activity
  • INPUT literary techniques me provide examples and ask them basic questions using the lit terms myself "is this passive voice or active voice"? Is this 1st person or 3rd person?
  • INPUT to OUTPUT build on examples from previous activity and ask them to generate theories about deeper meanings. Ex: why use the passive voice? What impression does the 1st person narrative give you?
  • OUTPUT small groups they have to produce the literary vocab and examples in the text that illustrate them
  • OUTPUT small groups each create list of T/F statements, exchange with another group and answer the questions
  • OUTPUT individual students identify more examples themselves-they have to produce the literary vocab and examples in the text that illustrate them
  • OUTPUT reading portfolio 
  • OUTPUT summative assessment (choice from a list, see below)

Each text:
  • INPUT: historical/cultural context: me provide basic info and ask basic comprehension questions (T/F, multiple choice) based on them. Do as homework and turn in directly in Canvas.
  • preview/predicting activity
  • OUTPUT they identify lit technique examples-they have to produce the literary vocab and examples in the text that illustrate them
  • pause/post like Anne ACTFL 2018
  • COERLL collaborative reading. Or do something similar in Canvas or Padlet?: me post an excerpt and ask each to react to it then ask them to discuss their reactions with each other online
  • reading portfolio 
  • summative assessment (choice from a list, see below)

Summative assessment ideas:
  • rewrite a scene: ex different gender, time period, genre, country, etc then present it and lead a discussion how the text and language changed
  • create a trailer for the book (see Goodreads and YouTube for examples)-what would you choose to highlight and why?
  • adapt a scene for the movie version and film it: add costumes, background music, makeup, props, etc and explain how you chose to represent the text
  • write an analysis of a theme in one or more texts and what literary techniques are used to represent the theme

Final Project idea:
Turn one of the books/short stories into a film.

Part 1 write:
  • ·      Who will you cast?
  • ·      Where will you film? What historical, political, economic, social variables will you have to account for?
  • ·      Target audience? How will you market to them?
  • ·      Who will help fund it? (See target audience)
  • ·      What 2 key issues in the book will you focus on?
  • ·      What film techniques will you use to show them?
  • ·      What 2 scenes will you have to leave out?
  • ·      What 2 thinks will you have to adapt to make the film cohere? (think Hunger Games book vs film. In book Katniss’s perspective dominates. She doesn’t know there is a game designer watching the game unfold and unleashing new challenges. In the film the audience sees Katniss and the players AND we see the control booth where the game designer is manipulating everything).
Part 2 present (day of final exam) an overview of your proposal:
  1. ·        Each student is a possible producer with $10,000 to spend.
  2. ·        You need at least $20,000 to make your film
  3. ·        As you listen to each pitch decide how much money you will spend on the film
  4. ·        At the end, do you have enough to make your film?
_____________________
  • propose award categories for the texts we studied this semester (each student propose 1 or 2 categories?)
  • solicit nominees for each category from your peers
  • lead a discussion to persuade your classmates to vote for your nominees
  • vote: how persuasive were you?
How it turned out:

There were only 4 students. One was a native speaker. One had only one semester of accelerated first year French. There was often at least 1 person absent and at least 1 person who hadn't done the homework so they couldn't interact effectively with each other. 

The steps from input to output hinged on them working consistently every day, but most couldn't. Those that did were overwhelmed by the workload. 

Like many things I tried after reading extensively about them in ACTFL publications and from other experts, it proved impossible to do with the students at that institution with the limited resources and support it offered. 

Monday, March 30, 2020

Review for chp 6 exam-FREN 102

1. Le quartier Latin est près du parc Luxembourg. La cathédrale Notre Dame de Paris est au centre de la Seine. La Tour Eiffel est loin du Cimetière du Père Lachaise. Le Musée d'Orsay est en face de la Seine. (Hint: review the s'orienter vocab in Français interactif. https://www.laits.utexas.edu/fi/html/voc/06.html#051)

map of Paris monuments

2. Réponses possibles: Un quartier est informel, culturel, Un arrondissement est formel, officiel, et associé avec le gouvernment, le système d'éducation, et la politique (voter par exemple). Un quartier a des petits commerces comme les boulangeries et les cafés. Un arrondissment a des petits commerces et aussi des endroits administratifs comme la mairie et l'hôtel de ville.

3. Une centre ville typique française a une place avec un jardin ou une sculpture ou un monument. Il y a une église, des cafés, des boulangeries, et des petits commerces près de la place. Ma centre ville à Stoughton, WI a la mairie, une église, une bibliothèque, une boulangerie, 2 cafés, une chocolaterie, une fromagerie, des restaurants, un théâtre, un gymnase et un cinéma. Il y a une rivière et un pont près de la bibliothèque.

4 Verbe VANDERTRAMPP ou ordinaire?
a. aller (Vandertrampp ex: ils sont allés à Paris)
b. danser (ordinaire ex: tu as dansé à la fête)
c. avoir (ordinaire ex: il y a eu un film au cinéma le week-end dernier)

d. arriver (Vandertrampp ex Je suis arrivée à l'université à 9h)

5. Correct these mistakes. Virginie : Elle est allé au restaurant avec son mari et son fil__ parce que il est sa anniversaire. Ils  __mangé une pizza.

Elle est allée au restaurant avec son mari et son fils parce qu'il est son anniversaire. Ils ont mangé une pizza.

Thursday, March 26, 2020

Mon quartier-solidarité avec FREN 102 printemps 2020

Voilà mon quartier.

Il y a un parc derrière ma maison (ma maison est à gauche de cette image).

Il y a un supermarché. Les personnes qui travaillent à Pick n Save sont gentilles, mais je n'aime pas les fruits et les légumes.

Au coin avec le supermarché il a une pharmacie, Walgreen's.

En face du parc il a un petit lac et des arbres.

Derrière le parc il y a un restaurant. On mange trop souvent à Culver's!

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Running and Ruminating on Gender


I celebrated the Super Bowl by requesting my husband make something comfort foody for dinner while I watched Up with the girls. Without being able to put it into words, I dismissed it as something that doesn't entirely align with my values.

In the morning my Facebook feed was filled with commentary on the half-time show by Shakira and Jennifer Lopez. Several friends posted enthusiastic reactions. Two were dismayed at what they thought was the hypersexualization of the performance. One described the performance as "crap." Others said they were horrified that their daughters saw it (ranging between 4 and 8 years of age, no concerns over similarly aged sons seeing it were raised in my feed).

I saw these reactions while marching on the treadmill as a warm-up to a 3 mile run. I ended up running over 4 miles. My mind kept coming back to the reactions.

The first word that came to mind was "intersectional feminism." To someone who is middle-class, white, and in her upper 30s or older (as most of my Facebook friends are), shock at the objectification is an understandable reaction. Women provocatively posing in skimpy clothes sounds like the kind of objectification a self-respecting feminist would critique.

But we have to dig deeper and consider who the performers are. Shakira is 43. Jennifer Lopez is 50. Both are married with children. It is remarkable that these women "of a certain age" have the bodies to exude such sexiness, stamina, and talent (dancing OR singing, singing OR pole-dancing would be feats in themselves!). Consider how many Hollywood films pair a male actor with a female romantic interest who is 15 years younger or more. Consider how few film roles women over 40 are offered. The struggle models face as they age. Our culture's obsession with youth. Not to mention the puritanical fixation on women's purity and society's discomfort with women being sexual being period. Now go back to the half-time show. If we consider age/ageism then the performance was absolutely empowering. We have to acknowledge that age intersects with gender here.

It's also important to consider the performers are Latina and compelling research shows that women earn less than men for doing the same job, Black women earn less than white women, and Latina women make even less. Given the horrors of migrants being held in modern day concentration camps, calls for a border wall, and rhetoric painting Mexicans as criminals, we have to acknowledge these women's identities. It is important that they are Latina, spoke Spanish, and used imagery that evokes these political issues. We have to acknowledge that ethnicity intersects with gender here.

If we embrace intersectionality, and we have to if we really want to understand gender and make a claim like "that's objectification," we have to realize the sum of these intersections *could* actually be positive.

My next reaction to the whole thing was disgust. Why are people fixated on women's bodies when there are SO MANY UGLY THINGS ASSOCIATED WITH THE NFL?!! Let's start with the sharp increase in sex trafficking on the day of the Super Bowl. Colin Kaepernick. Concussions. Conditioning men and the boys they are when they start playing the sport that violence solves problems. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. Hell, the cheerleaders' uniforms. Why the outrage over Shakira and JLo when there are SO MANY other things to be outraged about? Why were these women (all the original concerns were posted by women in my feed) so concerned about this? Why were they only concerned for their daughters? Why didn't they think their SONS being raised to see ALL of this was problematic?

While watching YouTube music videos on the treadmill a commercial for My Fair Lady at the Overture Center came on. Critics are already celebrating it. It's a popular play. The juxtaposition was maddening. Apparently it's okay for MEN to control women's lives. To decide that how they look and the way they support themselves are not appropriate. To take steps to manipulate them into changing themselves to conform to how men want to see them. Sure. That's great. But two multi-talented women who decided for themselves how to share those talents with the world should be silenced and their bodies should be hidden? That is REAL objectification.

Yeah. Nothing about the Super Bowl or the NFL aligns with my values. My kids had no interest in the Super Bowl so I didn't have to police their experience with it. If they HAD seen it I wouldn't object. I would have embraced having a conversation about all the problems with the spectacle and the organization that runs it. I would have faced the importance of ethnicity in the debate. I don't think we live in a post-racial society and it's definitely not color-blind. I would have celebrated two gorgeous women shaking their asses off with a healthy dose of critical analysis. Because those are my values.

Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Spring 2019 Reading: Haitian Novels "La mémoire aux abois" and "Saisons sauvages"


In the fall of 2018 a student who did a 1 credit independent study decided she wanted to read another novel about the Duvalier regime in Haiti since she had enjoyed the themes in Les Chemins de Locomiroir (1992) by Lilas Desquiron. She did some research into possible novels and found two candidates, La mémoire aux abois (2010) by Evelyne Trouillot and Saisons sauvages (2010) by Kettly Mars. She selected the latter for the independent study, but lent me both. 

I started with La mémoire aux abois in April. 


It took a while to see the rhyme & reason behind the narrative structure. It alternates between regular font and itallics. One voice is the nurse and the other is the widow of a powerful Haitian dictator. Goodreads describes it as "un roman du dialogue," but "dialogue" suggests direct communication and the vast majority of it was not direct, nor was it communicative in the sense that neither woman knew what the other was thinking.

Also from Goodreads: "Dialogue improbable, impossible, combat entre deux mémoires : celle de la veuve qui se remémore la rencontre avec l'époux défunt, ce qu'étaient alors leurs rêves, en tous les cas les siens, puis les années terribles de l'exercice du pouvoir, et puis celle de la jeune femme toute imprégnée des souvenirs que sa mère lui a transmis - sa mère qui a vécu ces années de cauchemar et perdu son frère alors qu'elle n'était qu'une enfant. Paroles qui se cherchent, s'opposent, mangées de silences, de regrets et de reproches, dans une atmosphère qui se tend peu à peu entre la veuve oscillant entre regrets murmurés et méfiance, et puis la jeune femme, et à travers celle-ci, sa mère décédée dont les souvenirs la hantent et l'envahissent."

Just as the widow and the nurse end up talking past each other, so did the widow and her husband when he was alive and the nurse and her mother when she was alive. Despite the poor communication, it's obvious they bear the traces of the dictator's and mother's own traumas.

The majority of the book is each character sharing anecdotes and it was hard to know what the connection was between them until the last 30 pages, which made it clearer. You know the nurse’s family, like most Haitians (Quisquéyans) have been impacted by the dictatorship’s violence, but until then it wasn't clear how the 2 are connected.

The alternating perspectives give a good sense of two key groups of people in Haiti, the wealthy mulatto elite and the working class. They illustrate what it’s like to seek marriage and children against the backdrop.

It was fascinating to see that the country is clearly meant to be Haiti, but Trouillot doesn’t call it that. When it so clearly is, what is gained from not? Thanks to this book, I just learned the term for this kind of novel is "roman à clef" where real people or events appear with invented names.

The clearest theme is the idea that trauma can be transmitted to one’s loved ones, which means Haitians have a long road ahead of them.

Other passages I noted:
April 21, 2019 –
page 181
 "To 184 nurse has talked about wanting to kill the dictator’s wife but instead when the old woman has an attack that threatens her life, she saves her bc her mother values life above all else. All of the moves lost meant something & are connected."
April 21, 2019 –
page 171
  "To 177 November 1980 suggestion the nurse’s father was involved in an attack ordered by the dictator."
April 21, 2019 –
page 168
  "A pattern is finally emerging. The widow talks about something and then the nurse talks about something and there’s a thread that connects them. Ex in this chp: having a baby."
April 21, 2019 –
page 161
 "At the end of his life the president refused to let his daughter succeed him even though she delegates tasks, makes decisions and runs the presidency. His only and final reason is she’s only a woman. Grr."
April 21, 2019 –
page 144
 "Consulting an hougan for president’s funeral & consultation w other important govt matters. Vaudou plays well with the locals who like their ties to the folk religion."
April 19, 2019 –
page 100
 "The other narrator is the widow of the dictator. I like the perspectives of two aged women, but it’s weird that one is mediated by her daughter. why. To show historical trauma is passed down through the generations?"
April 19, 2019 –
page 99
  "One narrator recounts her mother’s memories of Haiti w such detail that her own identity and history is almost totally absent. She remarks how the dictatorship is glued to her skin too because of her mother’s stories."
April 19, 2019 –
page 99
March 21, 2019 –
page 68
  "All things Haitian are slightly changed so they don’t actually describe Haiti, but rivers, cities and historical figures in France are all accurate. There’s a glossary in the back that corresponds to real life in Haiti. So why go to the effort of fictionalizing some, but not all?"
March 21, 2019 –
page 63
 "Family is from Port-du-Roi instead of Port-au-Prince. Clever."
March 21, 2019 –
page 61
  "Papa Fab (Fabien) bc he fought tuberculosis. Papa Doc (François) who was a doctor."
March 3, 2019 –
page 22
  "“Tu viens de Quisqueya...tu es une boat people?”

To her mom-you never understood how I carried your country in my injured looks...when I tried to tell you about the bullying I faced you shit me down because it was nothing compared to the horrors you’d been through” (pg 23)."
March 2, 2019 –
page 19
  "Mothers: common theme in Haitian lit
—widow thinks of her children and efforts to be a good mom, she was an orphan herself
—nurse thinks bitterly of her mother who lied about her father and scorned Haiti"
March 2, 2019 –
page 1
 "—France country of Les droits de la personne
—When his son was kidnapped he ordered all school children to be kept in their schools & if his kid was harmed he’d kill all of those kids.
—wife calls husband le Défunt, not by his name
—no one has names so far"
March 1, 2019 –
page 12
 "2 points of view:
-young nurse in regular font. Mother lived in “Quisqueya” under “Doréval” a dictator whose son succeeded him
-widow of the dictator in italics"

Then I read Saisons sauvages. Having read the student's weekly summaries and final project, I had a good sense of the characters and major themes already, but I wasn't prepared for the beauty of the writing. 


[Spoilers ahead!] Nirvah, a young mother of two is married to a journalist who is arrested for speaking out against the Duvalier dictatorship. Time passes and she has no information so she appeals to the minister who oversees security, and by extension the tonton macoutes, Raoul. He is immediately taken with her and later propositions her. If she sleeps with him, he will try to find out info and protect her. She is repulsed by his appearance and terrorized by the impossibility of the situation. If she doesn't sleep with him, will she guarantee her husband is never freed? As time passes she enjoys the privilege that comes from sleeping with a wealthy, influential man. She likes having a man in her bed. She thinks about her husband, but accepts her new reality. She has no idea Raoul has seduced both her son and daughter. Slowly Raoul loses power and money and can no longer protect Nivrah, despite his best efforts. She plans an escape with the kids and is apprehended at the very end. The ending is bleak.

The subject matter is so hard to stomach, but I have no doubt it captured the reality for many Haitian families. It was hard to contemplate the impossible choice Nirvah made, but also to see the parallels to the current political bullshit happening under Trump in the US. He is moving us incrementally closer to a dictatorship too. Those who begin in his favor eventually fall from grace, just as Raoul did. It’s like world leaders are drinking the same koolaid recipe Duvalier, Mussolini, Hitler and others use.

Much of the writing was powerful and evocative. Mars used some beautiful imagery and subtle foreshadowing. She captured pain & anguish really well. I liked how Nirvah was the primary narrator but Raoul’s perspective was integral and her kids also had small but momentous moments to weigh in too. Mars also painted a clear picture of life under Duvalier and the role vodou plays in Haiti and played under his rule. I may return to that theme later and work up an article on the topic.

There was a lot to like so why did I hesitate to give it 5 stars in Goodreads? Maybe because the ending was open-ended but likely tragic? That’s so typical of the fatalist, spiralist theme in much of Haitian lit so it’s not fair of me to penalize the book just for that. I’m not sure why, but 5 just felt too high.


Other specific passages and ideas I noted:
June 15, 2019 –
page 290
  "-waiting for Daniel and clinging to hope of seeing them was like anchoring a kite with cement
-being with Raoul was like being several different women. Nirvah didn’t know who she is anymore."
June 15, 2019 –
page 280
  "Misc notes
-R invests in lwa to assure his power & wealth continue
-R seduced Nicolas in the same way Greek men did young men, to imitate and mentor them
-R is like all other Noirs who claim to support a black Haiti but leap at the chance to sleep w a mulâtresse
-"
June 12, 2019 –
page 103
 "Raoul gives Nirvah jewelry and she looks at it thinking they call her, beckon her, look for her neck, earlobes & wrist like the tentacles of a formidable (redoutable) beast."
June 12, 2019 –
page 93
  "Raoul thinks about Duvalier: all gratitude is weakness. The Duvalier principle is to bite the hand that feeds you, even the whole arm if necessary. If someone offers you help it’s because they feel sorry for you."
June 11, 2019 –
page 92
  "Raoul is convinced the spasms he had after touching N were the result of vodou lwas protecting her. He notes he’s over due to pay homage to a spirit himself."
June 4, 2019 –
page 66
 "Narration alternated between Nirvah & Raoul. He finishes chp 10 & foreshadows the cruelty and lies he will put her through."
June 4, 2019 –
page 65
 "The minister has Contempt for mulâtres like Nirvah & her family"
May 31, 2019 –
page 50
  "Nirvah has light skin but grew up without the wealth associated w it. She’s a hybrid: bourgeois sometimes, peuple others. Like Violaine."
May 31, 2019 –
page 46
  "Déméplè is a lwa who uses a rattle (un asson). Nirvah knows it as an adj for having shady character but he is the neighbor’s lwa"
May 31, 2019 –
page 45
  "Neighbor is a manbo and prostitute who sleeps w macoutes. Nirvah contacted bishop for help w husband but the church is as powerless against Duvalier as anyone else. I wonder how Mars will develop vodou in the novel."
May 29, 2019 –
page 22
 "Raoul makes it clear he wants Nirvah because she is privileged and represents everything he couldn’t have. Possessing her means possessing those privileges. Typical male entitlement wrapped up in Haiti’s racial bullshit."
May 29, 2019 –
page 18
 "His attitude was disconcerting. My presence seemed to leave him indifferent, but “j’ai surpris des lueurs fauves dans certains de sea regards.”

Lyrical description. Fauve evokes “sauvage” in the title."
May 29, 2019 –
page 20
  "Il connaissait des femelles de toutes nuances d’épiderme qui se donnaient à lui pour rien, pour toucher seulement à son pouvoir.

Using “femelles” here conveys he sees women as animals, not people."