The chp 4 exam was similar in format, yet after 47 minutes not one student was finished and with the other exams several had finished after just 30 minutes. When I graded them almost everyone did much worse than the past exams. I mulled over what to do and then decided upon giving them an anonymous survey with questions on a Likert scale to find out if they studied for it differently than the others or if I failed to design a test that aligned with what they actually learned.
Here are the questions I asked:
Please answer this survey anonymously to give me feedback on the chp 04 exam.
1. Approximately how much time did you spend preparing for this exam?
0-30 minutes 30-60 minutes 1-2 hours more than 2 hours
2. How much time did you spend on this exam compared to the others? More time / less time
3. Did you run out of time to answer the questions as completely as you wanted? Yes / no
4. Do you think we needed to spend more time on this chapter before taking the exam? Yes / no
5. How well do you think the exam matched the activities and assignments you did for chp 4?
Not well at all not well no opinion pretty well extremely well
I did allow them to redo the essay questions at the end and I would average their score on that section with the original score. Of 8 students only 1 opted to do that and she already had a B+ grade.
I guess this is when horses and water come into the picture. You can get a teacher to reflect and offer students opportunities to do better, but you can't make the students come to the water and actually do the work to do better.
No comments:
Post a Comment