Showing posts with label Beyond_the_Textbook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Beyond_the_Textbook. Show all posts

Thursday, February 4, 2021

Beyond the Textbook: Authentic Materials Integrated Into FREN 103 Fall 2018

Here is a rough map of the authentic materials I integrated into each unit.

French 103
Unit
Resource
SLO
Interpretive, interpersonal or presentational?
00-01 greetings, classroom, je me présente
Evernote Un tour du monde-classrooms from around the world
#3 listening
#4 reading
#5 culture
#2 writing
(chp exam)
Interpretive listening
Presentational writing (on exam explain what is in different classrooms)
02
Families, time, passe-temps
CI my family-traditionnelle
#3 listening then
#1 speaking
Interpretive then interpersonal
CI Macron-recomposée
#4 reading then
#1 speaking
interpretive then interpersonal
Stromae Papaoutai-monoparentale
#3 listening then
#1 speaking
interpretive then interpersonal
Organiser une réunion(worksheet)
#2 writing
#3 listening
#1 speaking
Interpersonal then presentational
03
Weather, seasons, geography, activities
L’amour idéal worksheet 
#4 reading
#2 writing
#1 speaking
Interpretive then
Interpersonal then
presentational
M Pokora On danse-passe-temps worksheet
#3 listening
#2 writing
interpretive
Les loisirs pratiqués par les Français-reading
#4 reading
#5 culture
interpretive
Graphic organizer-talk about passe-temps
#1 speaking
#3 listening
Interpersonal then
presentational
Worksheet Français interactif SNCF plan a weekend
#4 reading
#5 culture
#2 writing
Interpretive then 
interpersonal
04
Professions, routines, natural resources
CVs français Oliver et Thierry et questions
#4 reading
#5 culture
#2 writing
Interpretive then
interpersonal
Gestion et utilisation des ressources-reading and questions
#4 reading
#5 culture
#2 writing
Interpretive then
interpersonal
Routines and resources in francophone country
#4 reading
#5 culture
#2 writing
Interpretive then
Interpersonal then
presentational
05
Food
What the World Eats website and comparisons
#4 reading
#5 culture
#1 speaking
interpretive
Photos dishes from Quebec
#4 reading (viewing)
#5 culture
#1 speaking
interpretive
Les repas scolaires en Francereading and questions
#4 reading
#5 culture
#2 writing
interpretive
Repas-différences culturelles
#4 reading (viewing)
#5 culture
#1 speaking
interpretive

Friday, December 28, 2018

Beyond the Textbook: Intellectual Rigor vs Communicative Skills in Essay Questions from Chp 5 FREN 103

One of my goals in moving "beyond the textbook," was to give students more authentic opportunities to use the language. Actually, that was practically the only goal. I hadn't adequately considered how those opportunities would compare to typical abilities for their level such as those articulated in the ACTFL Can Do statements. I hadn't considered if they would get enough practice attending to form (accurate verb conjugations, matching verbs to subjects, dropping the e in je when it precedes a word with a vowel, etc). I hadn't thought enough about the cultural knowledge they would develop.

This past semester (fall 2018) I embedded more authentic cultural resources into the curriculum and students generally did well on them. Those who did the homework did well on those assignments as well as the cultural questions on the exam. When we debriefed at the end of the semester they were able to discuss many cultural features about different countries, not just their own for which they were an "ambassador." While I used summative assessments with similar if not identical questions on the unit exams, I didn't use a course-level summative assessment that asked specifically about the knowledge they learned about French pastimes, global environmental management, single-parent families, etc. I wish I had so I had some data on their ability to handle more abstract, cultural knowledge.

After a semester of relegating the textbook to the backseat I think I can conclude that students can handle greater rigor in the form of intellectual knowledge, but I think their basic communicative language skills have suffered, compared to past semesters. When I think back to FREN 103 the fall of 2017 it seemed that almost everyone spoke with greater ease. I haven't compared exam scores, and since I modified the exams, the data might not be that relevant anyway. Maybe my feeling comes from a general lack of maturity in this year's group over last year's. This year there were more freshmen and more immature upperclassmen who struggled to attend regularly and come prepared when they did. Last year's group had a pre-med student, an honors student, and an overachiever adamant about learning French, among others with other strong qualities. I think last year's group was just better prepared to do the work necessary to gradually acquire language proficiency. Had I used more authentic resources last year, I may have found that group could handle BOTH the increased intellectual/cultural rigor AND more challenging communicative situations.

There is no way to know for sure, but I hope the students who continue on next semester are more committed to their schoolwork than they were this past semester.

Breaking Up with My Textbook: Some Background

For several years now I have noticed numerous articles in publications such as The Language Educator, Foreign Language Annals, and The French Review as well as blogs and Facebook groups, urging language educators to move away from a textbook-based curriculum in favor of made-from-scratch lessons built upon authentic materials made for native speakers like articles, novels, podcasts, and videos. Creating such units requires identifying an authentic source of “input,” breaking it down into manageable chunks, and creating manageable tasks of gradually increasing difficulty so students move from passive, basic understanding to thorough, applicable knowledge and skills. Research from linguists like Stephen Krashen suggests students need high quality “input” in order to be able to eventually produce high quality “output” (papers, presentations, portfolios, etc).

I have used the current French 101, 102, 103 and 203 textbook for almost ten years. The supporting materials I have developed for these courses are all tied to the chapter organization and content of Chez Nous, published by Pearson. Their robust online workbook, MyFrenchLab, contains tutorials, flashcards, grammatical explanations, and other resources. While I like many things about the textbook and online materials, the sequencing is somewhat illogical, the cultural examples within each chapter are almost all from France while the Francophone world is almost exclusively covered in the supplementary material relegated to the pages between chapters, it relies heavily on childish drawings in an infantilizing way, and many of the exercises are simplistic. On top of that, it is around $250 for the full package! The high cost is likely a result of the "supplemental" videos and accompanying activities that we rarely use. Even if we use it over three semesters, it's still an exorbitant price for something that we can only use pieces of due to time constraints. 

I am increasingly aware that in the field of second language teaching many teachers are moving towards a self-created curriculum. The belief is integrating real resources will enhance student’s cultural competence, an increasingly important facet of language learning in this global age. I have not yet had the time to carefully research, read, and analyze what the recognized experts in the field are currently doing. This process, including distilling down all the information into a collection of best practices will require considerable time.

I have long wanted to move away from a textbook in these courses. A close friend who teaches French at Cornell College, Dr. Devan Baty, also uses Chez Nous. We have both explored the recommendations from groups like ACTFL (The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages) and the AATF (American Association of Teachers of French), are similarly disenchanted with Chez Nous, and are similarly poised to undertake a challenge. 

All of these curricular changes will lead to substantial pedagogical change. Currently, I give students a homework syllabus for each chapter which indicates what page numbers to work on each day. It notes if there is homework and where to complete it (MyFrenchLab, Canvas, or on paper). Most exercises in MyFrenchLab are assessed by the software and students see their errors after submitting them. Before each class period, I review the grades on the exercises and note which were problematic for students. Then I build in time during the lesson to address those common errors. Having taught the courses with the existing curriculum for so many years, it is relatively easy to plan lessons because the general framework is in place. I slightly revise things, ensure there is time to address common errors, cull activities that did not work in the past and add new ones.

Here are some of the ways my pedagogy will change. All of my chapter syllabi and many of the worksheets and activities will become obsolete because they rely on Chez Nous’s sequencing in introducing culture, grammar and vocabulary. Those that can still be used will need to be revised so they fit seamlessly into the new curricular sequence. To ensure class time is spent using the language in authentic ways, not simply talking about it, I want to adopt a more thoroughly “flipped classroom” model. This will involve creating or finding and vetting videos explaining the major grammar concepts that students will view outside of class. I will need to develop comprehension exercises verifying that students understand the concepts in the videos. I will need to create a variety of activities ranging from simple to complex tasks to apply the concepts. Each unit will weave together an authentic text, related vocabulary and grammar, culture, and will culminate in a meaningful project. One model I am exploring is an “integrated performance assessment” (IPA) designed to build proficiency with clusters of assignments that reflect interpretive, interpersonal or presentational communication. All of these changes must be carefully undertaken so there is clear scaffolding to support students' growth so their proficiency develops. 

A key component of this process is creating a central, searchable repository of authentic materials. There are TONS of curated lists out there from organizations like the Association of Teachers of French (AATF) and others. A search of YouTube videos for a given concept will yield hundreds, if not thousands of options. There are hundreds of websites for museums, monuments, newspapers, podcasts, etc, all produced in French for native French speakers. How to harness the vast, but daunting potential of all that content? Given that other repositories exist, the goals for ours are:
  1. To be tagable and thus SEARCHABLE. We want to be able to tag a resource with multiple modalities (writing, listening, etc), multiple levels (beginning, intermediate, etc), as well as genre and geographic location so it can be leveraged in a multitude of ways
  2. To be largely focused on the FRANCOPHONE world
  3. To be curating and added to by STUDENTS
  4. To be ADA friendly, if not compliant




Monday, December 17, 2018

Beyond the Text: Assessing and Reflecting on Chp 4 Exam in FREN 103 fall 2018

Over the years my written exams have evolved so they are much less focused on form and much more focused on substance. This semester in particular I used videos of native speakers from the Français interactive website in the listening comprehension. I've given them more open ended questions like describing the weather and scenery they see in a photo. They get full credit for identifying 8 elements, the 8 student A picks could be different from those student B picks and that's okay. They're both working with elements that are meaningful to them. The final section is an essay question that asks them to apply autobiographical information to a logical setting.

The chp 4 exam was similar in format, yet after 47 minutes not one student was finished and with the other exams several had finished after just 30 minutes. When I graded them almost everyone did much worse than the past exams. I mulled over what to do and then decided upon giving them an anonymous survey with questions on a Likert scale to find out if they studied for it differently than the others or if I failed to design a test that aligned with what they actually learned.

Here are the questions I asked:

Please answer this survey anonymously to give me feedback on the chp 04 exam.

1.    Approximately how much time did you spend preparing for this exam?

0-30 minutes           30-60 minutes              1-2 hours         more than 2 hours

2.    How much time did you spend on this exam compared to the others? More time  / less time

3.    Did you run out of time to answer the questions as completely as you wanted?  Yes /  no

4.    Do you think we needed to spend more time on this chapter before taking the exam? Yes /  no

5.    How well do you think the exam matched the activities and assignments you did for chp 4?


Not well at all       not well       no opinion       pretty well    extremely well


The results were equal parts reassuring and maddening. They spent between 30 and 60 minutes preparing. This was about the same amount of time as for other exams. They did run out of time. They did NOT think we needed to spend more time on the chapter before the exam. They thought exam matched the activities and assignments very well. I shared the results and said I couldn't really draw any conclusions about what I could have done differently. 

I did allow them to redo the essay questions at the end and I would average their score on that section with the original score. Of 8 students only 1 opted to do that and she already had a B+ grade. 

I guess this is when horses and water come into the picture. You can get a teacher to reflect and offer students opportunities to do better, but you can't make the students come to the water and actually do the work to do better. 




Target Language Use in Partner Work

Intermediate French students recently worked in pairs to rewrite Candide, either a single scene or a modernization. There were 3 groups. One group (the most seasoned-upper level Spanish students taking French) did ALL the preparation in French. They suggested a complex rewriting of the play that involved changing the setting to modern day Alabama, Candide to a woman and a lesbian, and the whole thing explored a kind of fallacy theory for a result that was philosophical, substantive and lengthy.

The other two groups handled the project in English with a lot of joking and screwing around thrown in. How to make those groups more like the first? How to incentivize speaking in the target language?

  • The course syllabus notes the importance of staying in the TL during pair and group work, but I don't enforce it like I should. I need to circulate and redirect them to English early and often in the semester.
  • The grading for such assignments never takes into account HOW the project was planned. I will add that to the guidelines and rubric and attach points to it. It's actually not a bad idea to make them more cognizant of the processes they use to learn anyway. 
  • The directions always say both people need to take notes but inevitably only one does. I can build in points for the notes.
  • I can build in a reflection that asks them to comment on their language use while preparing the final project. 
  • The reflection could include a question about what words or expressions they heard their partner use that they can add to their own repertoire (thus learning from their peers, something to be celebrated)
  • I could direct each group to a different location and record themselves, then ask them to listen to themselves and reflect on THAT.



Tuesday, March 6, 2018

Foray into Comprehensible Input

A few weeks ago my intermediate students turned in a take-home exam and since I couldn't realistically expect them to prepare new material for the day, I opted to "comprehensible input" them with weather and season vocabulary. Normally I would assign them a few pages to pre-teach themselves a concept and a few exercises to give them practice with the basics. Instead, this was the framework of my lesson plan:

  • 5 minutes Me narrate/describe photos and weather outside
  • 2 min en français-faisons du brainstorming au tableau des nouveaux mots/expressions 
  • 2 min en français-nous utilisons le nouveau vocabulaire                       
                        aujourd’hui il… ?
                        en février en général il…. ?

I used images like this:
http://theplunder.com/i-photographed-my-dog-enjoying-a-snowy-day/

And:
http://laurentowers.blogspot.com/2013/07/stormy-day.html

This was a significant departure for them. They didn't stare at the book or rifle through pages to look at a vocab list. They answered the most basic of questions. For example: "Il fait chaud?" while pointing at the first photo. "Il neige?" while pointing at the second. I did as much repetition (and gesticulating) as I could before asking them to use the new words themselves. 

The results: 4 of the 6 students said they liked the format, although 2 added the caveat that they wouldn't want that format all the time. They were afraid of missing something if they looked away, but they also wanted to take notes. At the end of the unit, one added more emphatically that he thought the change was really helpful for him. 

I had very mixed feelings about the experience. The change to CI felt like the fairest way to begin the new material. I selected images ahead of time that would weave in a broad variety of vocab, but otherwise I didn't plan much ahead. I appreciated that they were all engaged. I was impressed by how much they could say after just 5 minutes or so. 

On the other hand, the success was thanks to MY preparation. They didn't have to do anything outside of class. Our accrediting body requires us to put a statement about the workload expectations for the course on the syllabus (1-2 hours outside of class per hour inside of class), but students NEVER, EVER put in that much time outside of class. I've been frustrated that we can't accomplish more task-based activities because they hinge on scaffolding that students must do outside of class. That day I wasn't frustrated by their lack of preparation, but the CI model totally circumvents those challenges, and not necessarily in a healthy way. It puts the responsibility almost solely on the instructor. I wonder what homework looks like in a purely CI-based classroom. With college age students, I resent essentially doing the hard work for them. 

My personal conclusion is that on days when I can't expect them to prepare outside of class, I am willing to integrate CI-lite strategies. I am willing to give a CI-esque intro to new chapters and concepts. I am unwilling to use CI everyday because it is so passive.